3 ms·
I'm okay with all of those things. Keep everyone protected and safe.
by ddtaylor 5y ago
I'm okay with all of those things. Keep everyone protected and safe.
- tibbon 5y agoThat is a really esoteric flavor of boot you seem to be enjoying to lick there…
- ddtaylor 5y agoWhy do you not accept the trade-off to protect children but give up a little bit of "freedom"?
- josefx 5y agoHow is that fourth point keeping anyone safe?
- ddtaylor 5y agoIt prevents the illegal distribution of copyrighted material.
- josefx 5y agoI repeat how does that keep anyone safe?
- ddtaylor 5y agoBy enforcing the copyright laws that exist already to protect content creators from being counterfeited and ripped off by illegal scammers and bootleggers. Are you saying you don't agree with the concept of copyrights?
- josefx 5y agoHow does showing Lion King at your kids birthday party qualify for any of that? I know I know, Disneys inability to collect money for every pair of eyes watching their movies during VHS times literally made it one of the poorest companies on the world. /s
- ddtaylor 5y agoDoes this mean you don't support copyright?
- josefx 5y agoDo you support mandatory cavity searches after every shopping trip? Property laws are important, you should do your part to uphold them.
- ddtaylor 5y agoI think this kind of client-side hashing and comparing to a database list is similar to the scanners at every Wal-Mart and the procedures at airports.
- exo762 5y agoLots of people don't support copyright. It's a concept that should be abolished in it's current form. Right to attribution is OK. Ability to restrict other forms of use is not OK.
- ddtaylor 5y agoDoes that mean if someone spends time and effort writing a book or painting a picture that I can resell it for less than them without their permission?