5 ms·

He's right on this: > SARS-CoV-2 is also carried by animals, which some hypothesize can spread the disease to humans. We will need to rid ourselves of dogs, ca

He's right on this: > SARS-CoV-2 is also carried by animals, which some hypothesize can spread the disease to humans. We will need to rid ourselves of dogs, cats, mink, bats and more to get to zero. Which means the headline is correct. Was there something in the article you thought was incorrect?

HarryHirsch 5y ago
The authors are penny-wise, pound-foolish. They underestimate the costs of future disruption compared to the cost of a sustained eradication effort. It's like with Hepatitis C and Medicare. We have very efficaceous drugs and could eradicate the disease if we wanted to but we don't budget enough. Instead, we let it spread and evolve resistance and run up costs in the indefinite future for no other reason than a lack of political will. The more we treat it now the less it'll cost us later.
- Overton-Window 5y ago
  If we can't feed the developing world, how do you suppose we'll immunise the developing world?
  - HarryHirsch 5y ago
    We are pretty good vaccinating the globe against polio and measles. We'll have to come down on covid because right now we are putting evolutionary pressure on it to become more virulent. A scenario like with Marek's disease is a distinct possibility.
    - Overton-Window 5y ago
      > We are pretty good vaccinating the globe against polio and measles. The institutions staffed by our grandparents generation delivered this, just as they delivered the Hoover Dam and Apollo 11. Contemporary western institutions are incompetent as the bungled COVID response has demonstrated. Even if we wanted to "come down on COVID" we couldn't, the golden era has passed.
      - stevenicr 5y ago
        "Contemporary western institutions are incompetent" - I'm not sure that's a fair or complete way of framing the issue. There was a story on NPR couple days ago(?) talking about the challenge of getting shots in arms in some of these third world places - and how we've delivered many shots that may expire because the infrastructure to get them where they need to go is not a thing.. sure you can blame gen xyz in the west but in situations like that if I was going to point to incompetent it wouldn't be on the west side. The covid response imho is more about desire/motivation - there is a large group of motivated noisy folks sure, but there are many people / groups who are not very motivated to vaccine with a survival rate of 99% or whatever number is accepted / wont get me labeled as an anti-vax grandma killing disinfo person. I am not a doctor or claiming this is accurate, and sure it's 'out of context - the suffering is more than death' all that - I'm just pointing out that the motivation is low and one of the reasons why. surely the large groups of you-must-vax-panic people could deliver a dozen hoover dams today, and I'm sure they'll all be on board for more apollos. "Even if we wanted to "come down on COVID" we couldn't," - I agree generally wit this part.. but not because a golden era has passed - it's because the larger group of folks around would rather stay open / not locked down and keep on keeping on.. (which does keep an economy rolling for future appollos - haha - (speaking lightly / not a mean or whatever voice!).) (not taking a political side with this btw, just counter-pointing the golden era is with the old people and today's mass of western power is not incompetent - although certainly we are more diverse in our reasoning for not getting some things done - new hoover dams would be hard to build more because of environmental worries, ethnic justice impacts and the like, not because we are less smart, or less willing to spent future generations money) unless you are inferring that today's insinuations are incompetent because they are held back by environmental and similar concerns that our grandparents did not worry about, but that's not the feel I got from reading that blurb.
- stevenicr 5y ago
  There are more than 2 options of course. We could keep the food lines running regardless of variants, we could prevent much of the disruption by staying open. hep c - sure we could budget more and that may wipe out much more.. we could also take the drug from the patent holders and sell it for $10 instead of $10,000 or whatever it is. Instead we do let it spread, I agree. Just adding a couple more options to changing the way we've been doing thing.
- NoPie 5y ago
  Hepatitis C is spread primarily by blood-to-blood contact. Treatments exists and are effective. Whereas covid is very infectious, can spread by air, no good treatments exists and vaccines are good but does not fully prevent infection and spreading. How else do you propose to eradicate it?
- unearth3d 5y ago
  Yes, we have the same kind of idiots here NZ, they go by "Plan B". All economists with a sprinkling of racists, if we'd gone their way we'd look like Louisiana or England.
- mikem170 5y ago
  Do you really think covid cold be eradicated? The only virus we ever eradicated was smallpox, and only because that didn't have an animal reserve. Covid will keep jumping between animals and humans. There are at least a dozen different mammals that harbor the virus. It can't be eradicated from humans while this is true. I have never seen any scientific authority talking about eradication as being a possibility. Do you assume that we will kill all these animals all over the world to try to eradicate covid?
- landemva 5y ago
  "The more we treat it now the less it'll cost us later." This is a good economic talking point. Is there a reference for your claim, or did you make it up?
  - HarryHirsch 5y ago
    Found you one. This study includes epidemiology.: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721427/ Even if you exclude the epidemiologic downstream effects Hep C eradication treatment is likely cost-effective: https://www.ajmc.com/view/cost-effectiveness-of-total-state-coverage-for-hepatitis-c-medications https://www.ajmc.com/view/cost-effectiveness-of-total-state-...

HarryHirsch 5y ago

The authors are penny-wise, pound-foolish. They underestimate the costs of future disruption compared to the cost of a sustained eradication effort. It's like with Hepatitis C and Medicare. We have very efficaceous drugs and could eradicate the disease if we wanted to but we don't budget enough. Instead, we let it spread and evolve resistance and run up costs in the indefinite future for no other reason than a lack of political will. The more we treat it now the less it'll cost us later.

Overton-Window 5y ago
If we can't feed the developing world, how do you suppose we'll immunise the developing world?
- HarryHirsch 5y ago
  We are pretty good vaccinating the globe against polio and measles. We'll have to come down on covid because right now we are putting evolutionary pressure on it to become more virulent. A scenario like with Marek's disease is a distinct possibility.
  - Overton-Window 5y ago
    > We are pretty good vaccinating the globe against polio and measles. The institutions staffed by our grandparents generation delivered this, just as they delivered the Hoover Dam and Apollo 11. Contemporary western institutions are incompetent as the bungled COVID response has demonstrated. Even if we wanted to "come down on COVID" we couldn't, the golden era has passed.
    - stevenicr 5y ago
      "Contemporary western institutions are incompetent" - I'm not sure that's a fair or complete way of framing the issue. There was a story on NPR couple days ago(?) talking about the challenge of getting shots in arms in some of these third world places - and how we've delivered many shots that may expire because the infrastructure to get them where they need to go is not a thing.. sure you can blame gen xyz in the west but in situations like that if I was going to point to incompetent it wouldn't be on the west side. The covid response imho is more about desire/motivation - there is a large group of motivated noisy folks sure, but there are many people / groups who are not very motivated to vaccine with a survival rate of 99% or whatever number is accepted / wont get me labeled as an anti-vax grandma killing disinfo person. I am not a doctor or claiming this is accurate, and sure it's 'out of context - the suffering is more than death' all that - I'm just pointing out that the motivation is low and one of the reasons why. surely the large groups of you-must-vax-panic people could deliver a dozen hoover dams today, and I'm sure they'll all be on board for more apollos. "Even if we wanted to "come down on COVID" we couldn't," - I agree generally wit this part.. but not because a golden era has passed - it's because the larger group of folks around would rather stay open / not locked down and keep on keeping on.. (which does keep an economy rolling for future appollos - haha - (speaking lightly / not a mean or whatever voice!).) (not taking a political side with this btw, just counter-pointing the golden era is with the old people and today's mass of western power is not incompetent - although certainly we are more diverse in our reasoning for not getting some things done - new hoover dams would be hard to build more because of environmental worries, ethnic justice impacts and the like, not because we are less smart, or less willing to spent future generations money) unless you are inferring that today's insinuations are incompetent because they are held back by environmental and similar concerns that our grandparents did not worry about, but that's not the feel I got from reading that blurb.
stevenicr 5y ago
There are more than 2 options of course. We could keep the food lines running regardless of variants, we could prevent much of the disruption by staying open. hep c - sure we could budget more and that may wipe out much more.. we could also take the drug from the patent holders and sell it for $10 instead of $10,000 or whatever it is. Instead we do let it spread, I agree. Just adding a couple more options to changing the way we've been doing thing.
NoPie 5y ago
Hepatitis C is spread primarily by blood-to-blood contact. Treatments exists and are effective. Whereas covid is very infectious, can spread by air, no good treatments exists and vaccines are good but does not fully prevent infection and spreading. How else do you propose to eradicate it?
unearth3d 5y ago
Yes, we have the same kind of idiots here NZ, they go by "Plan B". All economists with a sprinkling of racists, if we'd gone their way we'd look like Louisiana or England.
mikem170 5y ago
Do you really think covid cold be eradicated? The only virus we ever eradicated was smallpox, and only because that didn't have an animal reserve. Covid will keep jumping between animals and humans. There are at least a dozen different mammals that harbor the virus. It can't be eradicated from humans while this is true. I have never seen any scientific authority talking about eradication as being a possibility. Do you assume that we will kill all these animals all over the world to try to eradicate covid?
landemva 5y ago
"The more we treat it now the less it'll cost us later." This is a good economic talking point. Is there a reference for your claim, or did you make it up?
- HarryHirsch 5y ago
  Found you one. This study includes epidemiology.: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721427/ Even if you exclude the epidemiologic downstream effects Hep C eradication treatment is likely cost-effective: https://www.ajmc.com/view/cost-effectiveness-of-total-state-coverage-for-hepatitis-c-medications https://www.ajmc.com/view/cost-effectiveness-of-total-state-...