2 ms·
>There is no such thing as superpositions of multiple objects, especially if they are distinguishable like cats. Several superpositions of several cats makes a
by whatshisface 5y ago
>There is no such thing as superpositions of multiple objects, especially if they are distinguishable like cats.
Several superpositions of several cats makes an ensemble of experiments over which it would not be as difficult to detect entanglement as it would be in the case of one cat, which is the case that Aaronson describes.
- krastanov 5y agoJust write the ket describing that state and specify over what Hilbert state it is. At best, "superposition" does not mean what you are using that word for. It just sounds like nonsense right now.
- whatshisface 5y ago1/sqrt(2) |alive> + 1/sqrt(2) |dead> Take several of these and you can collect data across several expeirments that shows they're in a superposition, but if you only have one, Aaronson's argument applies.