> The question is whether this is normal enforcement, or whether this is selective enforcement. We don't have enough information to know which it really was, an

> The question is whether this is normal enforcement, or whether this is selective enforcement. We don't have enough information to know which it really was, and Facebook has every reason to lie if it was selective enforcement. Yes, they would have, but that doesn't mean the title does not conveniently omit that part to make it seem more outrageous than the first paragraph already makes it seem.