4 ms·
Got a better source? This website contains misinformation. https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/ https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/ > E) The facemask aer
by some_hacker33 5y ago
Got a better source? This website contains misinformation.
https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/ https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
> E) The facemask aerosol issue
> In the following video, Dr. Theodore Noel explains the facemask aerosol issue.
https://factcheck.afp.com/doctor-expired-license-falsely-claims-masks-dont-work https://factcheck.afp.com/doctor-expired-license-falsely-cla...
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/feb/08/facebook-posts/no-vaping-demo-doesnt-prove-masks-dont-work-agains/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/feb/08/facebook-p...
the fact that we have accounts on here with large amounts of reputation reposting facebook-based misinformation does not give me faith that leaving these choices up to allegedly informed individuals is a good idea. as others have pointed out, 99.99% of people are in no way qualified to make such determinations.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- AndrewBissell 5y agoThe links to the primary sources are all right there on the page. I'm not going to go hunting for some other compilation of the same data because you went clicking through the entire site until you found something which contradicted a not-very-convincing Politico "fact check" article. Especially not after Politico had to withdraw their earlier fact check -- chock full of quotes from "the experts" -- about how Covid couldn't possibly have come from a lab.