5 ms·
How is this any different than requiring people to wear shoes in specific locations? Some people prefer not to wear shoes, but for the legal liability and the r
by bob33212 5y ago
How is this any different than requiring people to wear shoes in specific locations? Some people prefer not to wear shoes, but for the legal liability and the risk of injury many locations require shoes. Don't go to those places if you feel strongly about not getting the vaccine or wearing shoes
- slumdev 5y agoShoes don't have systemic side effects.
- bob33212 5y agohttps://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/1998/cpsc-nike-announce-recall-of-mens-air-face-up-basketball-shoes https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/1998/cpsc-nike-announce-recall-...
- danhak 5y agoThe government does not have a shoe mandate. As far as I know, individual businesses are free to have whatever policies they wish regarding shoes.
- cm2187 5y agoI got sick like a dog for a day after my first dose, and had a pain in the arm for a week after my second dose. You can't compare injecting a pathogen in someone's body to wearing clothes.
- bob33212 5y agoTell that to the people who were injured by Nike. https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/1998/cpsc-nike-announce-recall-of-mens-air-face-up-basketball-shoes https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/1998/cpsc-nike-announce-recall-...
- pengaru 5y ago> You can't compare injecting a pathogen in someone's body to wearing clothes. A vaccine is not a pathogen, a pathogen is a disease-causing agent, vaccines are not causing disease, they cause an immune response to prevent future disease.
- rubyist5eva 5y agoYou can't honestly see the difference between an easily visible piece of clothing versus medical data that many people consider private between them and their physician(s)? There is zero chance this is a good faith argument.
- bob33212 5y agoObviously I can see shoes on people's feet easier than I can see antibodies inside someone. But the point isn't how I find out if you are wearing shoes or not. The point is that someone is telling you that you have to do something to your body. Putting on shoes and getting a vaccine are both actions that you may want to decide to do on your own and not have someone else tell you that you have to do.
- rubyist5eva 5y agoIt's a matter of degrees my guy, and people aren't rabidly frothing at the mouth to eject non-shoe wearers from common society.
- bob33212 5y agoTrue, And people are not calling businesses that require shoes socialist. Social media is making all these idiots act like the world is ending if someone requires a vaccine or refuses to get the vaccine.
- rubyist5eva 5y agoThere's also a difference when a business decides on it's own to mandate shoes, versus a government mandate for all businesses. I would be just as against a government mandate that all private establishments must have a no shirt/no shoes policy. I don't even think a vaccine mandate for private businesses would be constitutional under the first amendment, the courts have recognized multiple times that freedom of association is protected even if it is not explicit in the constitution.