3 ms·
> However, as Protocol noted in March, the information collected from accounts that did not “consent to the collection” that Clark appears to be referring to wa
by TazeTSchnitzel 5y ago
> However, as Protocol noted in March, the information collected from accounts that did not “consent to the collection” that Clark appears to be referring to was actually advertisers’ accounts, not private users.
- judge2020 5y agoI don't think we should expect Facebook to go digging into every scraping extension to see if the scraping is done to obtain user data vs. advertiser data (stuff Facebook is also trying to protect, mind you). Especially with the amount of obfuscation and extensions they likely need to deal with.
- TazeTSchnitzel 5y agoFacebook already must have dug into the extension because they complained about what it does. This is a strange defence.
- mcguire 5y agoSo Facebook's users rather than their raw materials.