3 ms·
My honest opinion (as someone with no dog in this fight) is that the author was naive and really bad at PR, but is improving overtime. I generally encourage ne
by andrewnc 5y ago
My honest opinion (as someone with no dog in this fight) is that the author was naive and really bad at PR, but is improving overtime.
I generally encourage new programming language efforts, so I'm willing to be more generous with forgiveness in the hopes that this succeeds.
- jstimpfle 5y agoIt's not even a question of "how bad". There was way too much PR given how immature the project was, at least at the time. I don't think the author had had a lot of experience as a language designer / compiler implementer when the project was started. One advertised feature of the compiler was its supposed simplicity, such as getting along without an AST. I doubt this was a good choice and I think they ended up adding one in. In my perception it was mostly sold as a piece of engineering by PR like this (quote from OP): Cheapest server $160 $20 $3.50 [2]
- osmarks 5y agoThey made hugely exaggerated/false claims while raking in lots of Patreon money.
- ylluminate 5y ago"Lots" is very, very subjective. What country do you live in? I would say (as an appreciative donor/patron myself) there has been very, very little in the way of direct donations to the founder himself. This is no "get rich quick" scheme. Frankly I don't know of any programming language that's ever been such a quickie in this regard.
- osmarks 5y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20230351 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20230351 says they got $927/month some time ago, which is a decent amount of income I think. It seems to be less now.