The critiques are all acknowledged in the discussion. It’s a good study with important caveats for sure, but I feel like people who feel the need to critique it

The critiques are all acknowledged in the discussion. It’s a good study with important caveats for sure, but I feel like people who feel the need to critique it on Twitter rather than appropriate channels probably have an agenda and maybe one that is counter the medical interests of the study population. Why would a parent report other long COVID symptoms but not neurocognitive ones? To me it’s reassuring but not really “slam dunk.” An imperfect study is better than nothing at all.