4 ms·
Makes sense. The climate movement has always blatantly been about non-productive people appropriating money from others who have been engaged in productive ente
by Tycho 5y ago
Makes sense. The climate movement has always blatantly been about non-productive people appropriating money from others who have been engaged in productive enterprise.
- WitCanStain 5y agoA truly strange take. For decades people barely cared about scientists warning of the horrors to come. Participating in the climate movement is a very inefficient way to acquire money.
- the-dude 5y agoWas very inefficient perhaps. Now it is a prerequisite for politicians and scientists. Otherwise, no funds for you.
- Balero 5y agoThe climate movement has been about holding people accountable. Specifically people who have made money causing the biggest problem we have to date, and who are currently trying to slow down people actually fixing things. If you made your money relying on the tragedy of the commons, then you were not in a productive enterprise.
- Tycho 5y agoBasically everyone has benefited and chosen to use energy generated from fossil fuels, except maybe remote hunter gatherer tribes. It’s ridiculous to single out enterprises involved in the extraction of generation part of the supply chain while the whole world cheerfully used their output. Unless you’re just a political money grabbing operation, in which case principles don’t matter, obviously.