I think a better point would be "simple systems are quicker to fix" or, more concise, "avoid unnecessary complexity". In some way, complexity allows flaws to ge

I think a better point would be "simple systems are quicker to fix" or, more concise, "avoid unnecessary complexity". In some way, complexity allows flaws to get in, but that does not mean it's unnecessary. Take, for example, website hosting. You can put your full page on a single server, but then you're prone to the machine going down, the disk having errors etc.. A more complex system, like Kubernetes, will be far harder to troubleshoot, but it will not go down just because one machine died. Or, as an engineering example, take planes: They're a lot more complex than ships. Fixing them when something is wrong can take long. But that complexity is needed so what when something fails, you get to the airport instead of going through a rapid unscheduled disassembly.