2 ms·
you are arguing against one type of bias by introducing another. This is not science this is ideology.
by ThomPete 5y ago
you are arguing against one type of bias by introducing another. This is not science this is ideology.
- sammalloy 5y agoMy argument represents the exact opposite of bias. If the IPCC estimates are too conservative and result in poor predictions, and if their consensus mechanism excludes worst case scenarios, then more inclusive estimates and including more scenarios leads to more impartiality—the opposite of bias.
- ThomPete 5y agohow do you know that your choice of sources isnt the one thats biased? You dont. You are engaging in ideology not science. The very fact that you dont see this and just assume you have the right perspective illustrates my point. You are an ideologue.