4 ms·
They may give on this in the end, but it still shows the problem of consolidating too much power in one place. I have no problem with FB disabling my account, b
by koobaf 15y ago
They may give on this in the end, but it still shows the problem of consolidating too much power in one place. I have no problem with FB disabling my account, because it's not a necessity. But if G+ decided it was OK to disable my Gmail because of a change in policy, or a rogue automated profile checker then that's an entirely different story.
- simonk 15y agoread the post, if you are suspended on google+ due to a name issue, the rest of your account works fine.
- doctoboggan 15y agoIn the post he says your Gmail will not be disabled if you used a fake name.
- pgroves 15y agoFrom the article: (Of course there are other Google-wide policies (e.g. egregious spamming, illegal activity, etc) that do apply to all Google products, and violations of these policies could in fact lead to a Google-wide suspension.) So don't post about your favorite torrents site that violates copyright law. Or if you're like me and live in Illinois, video tape a police officer because that violates wire tapping laws. Yes, I know I would be in violation of this policy if I sent an email from gmail about these things, but I'm guessing I'm more likely to get caught if it's on g+. Keeping my gmail account active is worth far more to me than any potential benefits of google+ at this point. In any event, the down votes on the grandparent were uncalled for.