4 ms·
I'm not responding to anything other than the rebranding myth, because that's what I originally responded about. Going beyond that scope would involve walls of
by kazoomonger 5y ago
I'm not responding to anything other than the rebranding myth, because that's what I originally responded about. Going beyond that scope would involve walls of text that HN is ill-suited for, as evidenced by the amount of text already written for a narrowly-scoped topic.
I'm here because I saw a comment repeating a falsehood, and wanted to call it out. I dislike seeing blatantly wrong things such as this:
https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/global_warming_words.jpg https://i0.wp.com/wattsupwiththat.com/wp-content/uploads/201...
- OrvalWintermute 5y agoPlease, take your manichean battles around political extremes elsewhere. HN is not the place for ideologies.
- kazoomonger 5y ago> "I'm not being political, you're being political!" Your original comment had factually incorrect information, as demonstrated. Please don't try and hide that behind name calling or distractions.
- OrvalWintermute 5y agoThe original commment I made was: > Before there was Climate Change, there was Global Warming. > Why was there a name change, a rebranding if you will? In some cases, there is conflation, but they mean very different things. > When it comes to Climate, scientists say that climate is in 30 year intervals. Day to day that is just weather. So, stay on topic.
- kazoomonger 5y agoI'm not sure what you mean? This is the entire and only topic that I have talked about, straight from your original comment: > Before there was Climate Change, there was Global Warming. > Why was there a name change, a rebranding if you will? That quote contains factually incorrect information, as discussed above.