> Had Spence been fired for spreading union material then yes it probably would have been a violation of labor laws. Nope, still wrong. It's a violation to pro

> Had Spence been fired for spreading union material then yes it probably would have been a violation of labor laws. Nope, still wrong. It's a violation to prohibit, it doesn't need to lead to any retaliation to be a violation [1]. Hence the complaint. If the security officer, even if a contractor acts as an agent of Amazon, it's on Amazon. Even because they didn't train the officer about the NLRA (or they did? who knows? it's on the agency to investigate). That's why when you do some corporate mandated training, you need to acknowledge and sign that you completely understood whatever was in there. To cover the company's ass. > Although I have been restless down voted https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:If_ten_people_say_you%27re_drunk,_lie_down https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:If_ten_people_say_yo... [1] https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/olms/regs/compliance/eo_posters/employeerightsposter11x17_2019final.pdf https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/olms/regs/compliance/...