I agree with your basic premise, and I agree that there are areas we should look at using hydrogen, but I'm not sure I follow how it's being applied here. The h

I agree with your basic premise, and I agree that there are areas we should look at using hydrogen, but I'm not sure I follow how it's being applied here. The hydrogen lifecycle would be > power source > grid > hydrogen generation > truck > power And the lifecycle in the article is > power source > grid > truck > power There are fewer energy conversions and it's hard to envision a system with fewer losses. I'm not arguing against hydrogen. Just trying to understand why hydrogen would be considered superior to the article's method.