3 ms·
The obvious problem wiht your retort is, of course, you're assuming that every year, the runners in the BM are new to the race. This isn't true. I'm not sayin
by cujo 18y ago
The obvious problem wiht your retort is, of course, you're assuming that every year, the runners in the BM are new to the race. This isn't true.
I'm not saying his reasoning is sound, but your rebuttle isn't either.
- streety 18y agoAs I poorly stated in my initial comment I am aware of this problem. My hope was that by assuming virtually nobody ran the race 10 years ago, which I assume/hope is totally inaccurate, the two errors would cancel each other out. It's a 'back-of-a-napkin' calculation. Certainly not accurate but a nice place to start for future refactoring.