> Does anyone really believe that the Amazon employees voted against the union because Amazon removed some union material from the break room one day? Except t

> Does anyone really believe that the Amazon employees voted against the union because Amazon removed some union material from the break room one day? Except that's not the only thing that happened, which is clear in the opening paragraph of the article. Their were multiple infractions, one of which (giving "workers the impression that their organizing activity was being surveilled") would definitely without a question would cause people to vote against a union and be fearful of getting involved or gathering more information. And regardless of how many times it happened, it was illegal.