3 ms·

Yes, what you say is true. I come from South Asia, and I live in NL, so I fully understand this perspective. But rather, in the scope of this discussion, havin

• derefr 5y ago
  But for most of the world, the cost calculus doesn't work out, because inkjet printers are shitty and break down, and use up their super-expensive color cartridges to print B&W prints. (And laser printers don't work well in humid climates, so good luck using a color laser.) It's the same reason that in most of the world, you don't see people using those shaving razors with disposable razor-blade cartridges. They're too expensive over time, compared to a straight-razor / safety razor that can be sharpened. If you only ever need to print, say, five photos in your entire life, it's fine if each one takes a three-hour round-trip walk to town and the equivalent of a day's wages. That'll still be lower TCO than printing every B&W text report you ever need to print on a color inkjet, and so needing to feed it a new yellow cartridge every few months just so it can keep putting microdots on the paper.
  • yunohn 5y ago
    Nobody is advocating this for people who can’t afford it. We’re talking about those who can and do need to print often. I don’t know why we need to argue on about the poorest people who can’t afford it? Sounds like a rhetorical discussion honestly.