4 ms·

NoOps should be a banned term. The second anything goes wrong (which it will), it absolutely requires Ops.

• deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
• TeeWEE 5y ago
  Yes but you dont need to hire for it. Developers can do it, because Ops get easier.
  • xfitm3 5y ago
    I think this is a conflict of interest, ultimately. There should be separation of duties. You need guardrails in place, and you have to hire to manage these guardrails. In my experience development members know enough to be dangerous, and this can lead to misconfigurations / potential security incidents.
  • bradhe 5y ago
    Yeah but people read "No Ops" as "you don't need to do operations" not "you don't need to hire operations." You can try to fight that fight if you want but I think it's already come and gone.
  • deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]