3 ms·
We have to err on the side of saving lives, not speculation. Over 2 billion humans have been vaccinated so far, and rising. What's the worst case scenario here
by outworlder 5y ago
We have to err on the side of saving lives, not speculation. Over 2 billion humans have been vaccinated so far, and rising.
What's the worst case scenario here?
- mrhands69 5y agoBecause lockdowns are detrimental to society (mental health, division, etc). Why can't we take a level headed approach. It seems like our approaches don't take into any consideration past experiences with similar viruses, or leverage data. We have a lot more data this time around.
- aristophenes 5y agoThat by not focusing on vaccinating only the most vulnerable, we are just selecting for strains that the vaccines are not effective against.
- wizzwizz4 5y agoAnd selection is useless if the “gene pool” is small enough that the selection pressure just eradicates the disease entirely. If we get the R number to something like ⅒ and hold it there for a few months? Disease eradicated, job done, everybody goes home.