Quoting from that thread: > I don't think gpsd has any reason to be predicting when a future leap-second is going to occu Until last year, leap seconds had be

Quoting from that thread: > I don't think gpsd has any reason to be predicting when a future leap-second is going to occu Until last year, leap seconds had been very predicable. The effect of global warming on earth rotational speeds was only very recently seen, or even predicted. But, yes, going forward, that needs to change. > And the code in question is clearly expecting only positive leap-seconds. Yes, because until 2020, the thought of a negative leap second was unthinkable. I would welcome you testing that and seeing what falls out.