> And that was a good thing! The article literally questions that conclusion. "Were those the good old days? It’s tough to say." It's as if there were advant

> And that was a good thing! The article literally questions that conclusion. "Were those the good old days? It’s tough to say." It's as if there were advantages and disadvantages. It's easy to view the past as "good" but the reality, as presented in this article, was really a mixed bag.