> that use of C/C++ inevitably results in many memory safety issues, and that therefore we should use memory safe languages. Except this doesn't take into accou

> that use of C/C++ inevitably results in many memory safety issues, and that therefore we should use memory safe languages. Except this doesn't take into account the entire categories of vulnerabilities that have been entirely eliminated because of good C/C++ abstractions like process isolation, virtual memory, filesystems, tcp-ip, hypervisors, and so on. I don’t see your point here. Yes, C/C++ abstractions like process isolation, virtual memory, etc. are good, but languages like Rust don’t eliminate them.