>It also accused Zoom of misstating that it offers end-to-end encryption... I really think that we need some sort of standard definition for what this actually

>It also accused Zoom of misstating that it offers end-to-end encryption... I really think that we need some sort of standard definition for what this actually means. Pretty much everything claims E2EE these days just as long as there is some sort of encryption used somewhere in their system. Many (most?) are not doing something that would mean that only the end users would have access to the content, even in the face of assertive actions by the provider. Many get the technical details right but fail to properly inform the user about any critical actions required on the part of the user to make that possible. Providers of such things should be expected to explicitly state who you need to trust and under what circumstances.