4 ms·
>2) you can learn, i.e. those ridiculous questions; So why do I have to re-prove this at every new job? It's not obvious enough I can learn if I've learned a p
by vsareto 5y ago
>2) you can learn, i.e. those ridiculous questions;
So why do I have to re-prove this at every new job? It's not obvious enough I can learn if I've learned a programming language or framework in the past? Do companies have some brilliant insight into neuroscience where they know people become incapable of learning at some point?
Any 2/4-year degree should also answer that question as well. Lots of things can answer that question. Ridiculous questions are about the laziest way to test someone for it.