3 ms·
Subtly different, IMO. You’re expecting the mechanical engineer to recall something they learned about kinematics, not derive it on the spot. It’s a test of kn
by mattkrause 5y ago
Subtly different, IMO.
You’re expecting the mechanical engineer to recall something they learned about kinematics, not derive it on the spot. It’s a test of knowledge, rather than cleverness. The equations of motion are also more central to physics and engineering.
A decent programmer should know that linked lists exist, their general properties, pros and cons, etc. However, cycle detection is not a particularly common operation, so not knowing Floyd’s algorithm tells you very little—-and their failure to do years of research in 45 minutes even less.
- neutronicus 5y agoYeah, I think a closer analogue would be asking something like "derive the conserved quantities of the gravitational two-body problem" and then dinging candidates for forgetting about the Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector