4 ms·

What kind of hardware do you run? Mechanical drive? I have an ancient machine but with SSD, Windows 10 is still snappy.

by tored 5y ago

TheFreim 5y ago
I switched a while back to Linux and like my setup much better than what I can do on windows but I think a lot of the "windows is slow" stuff is overblown. I temporarily had windows installed the other day and it was just fine in terms of being "snappy".
- Andrex 5y ago
  A fresh install is fast for the first couple days, you say...
- afavour 5y ago
  Agreed. I run macOS and Windows via Bootcamp and Windows 10 feels snappier than macOS most days. The same might not be said for a new laptop loaded down with junkware, mind.
ycuser2 5y ago
Opening context menu of task bar items takes about 500 ms here with SDD and i7.
- tored 5y ago
  That is an operation I never do. I guess slowness can be attributed to that the menu is application aware, customizable menu options per application. But there is also a slow animation when opening the menu. And on top of that as soon as you hover above an item in the taskbar it wants to show a thumbnail preview of that window. All combined the user interaction feels a bit weird. I turned off "Animations in the taskbar" and I think the context menu got somewhat faster.
- mdre 5y ago
  Do you have many shell extensions installed? Try disabling some items on the context menu.
tendstofortytwo 5y ago
I think Windows 10 is simply very I/O dependent, much more so than older Windows or Linux, so having that SSD or not would make or break your experience. I've had really new (8th gen Intel) laptops perform absolutely atrocious until I swapped in an SSD. Ideally everyone should have an SSD in 2021, but that doesn't seem to have happened yet.
- tored 5y ago
  Yes, Windows 10 is very I/O dependent, it will not be a pleasant experience with a mechanical drive. Not sure if Windows 8 was too, I didn't use Windows 8 much (we all know why). If you can't afford a SSD drive, I recommend buy an older used one. Just as my machine is ancient, my SSD's are ancient too. My main drive is a Intel 530 180GB that started production in late of 2013.
  - AstralStorm 5y ago
    It was too, when you stayed in the new .NET UI, with additional bugs. Note that shell itself is one of those applications. The problem there I think it's that all the CLR VMs are not free, specifically the libraries in them are loaded from disk, sizable and not shared across processes, and lazy loaded. Same problem as if you ran a lot of JVM applications.
drewzero1 5y ago
RAM matters too. I never had much trouble running Windows 7 with 2, 3, or 4GB but since upgrading our office machines I've noticed they feel sluggish with anything under 8.

What kind of hardware do you run? Mechanical drive? I have an ancient machine but with SSD, Windows 10 is still snappy.

by tored 5y ago

What kind of hardware do you run? Mechanical drive? I have an ancient machine but with SSD, Windows 10 is still snappy.

I switched a while back to Linux and like my setup much better than what I can do on windows but I think a lot of the "windows is slow" stuff is overblown. I temporarily had windows installed the other day and it was just fine in terms of being "snappy".

Andrex 5y ago
A fresh install is fast for the first couple days, you say...
afavour 5y ago
Agreed. I run macOS and Windows via Bootcamp and Windows 10 feels snappier than macOS most days. The same might not be said for a new laptop loaded down with junkware, mind.

ycuser2 5y ago

Opening context menu of task bar items takes about 500 ms here with SDD and i7.

tored 5y ago
That is an operation I never do. I guess slowness can be attributed to that the menu is application aware, customizable menu options per application. But there is also a slow animation when opening the menu. And on top of that as soon as you hover above an item in the taskbar it wants to show a thumbnail preview of that window. All combined the user interaction feels a bit weird. I turned off "Animations in the taskbar" and I think the context menu got somewhat faster.
mdre 5y ago
Do you have many shell extensions installed? Try disabling some items on the context menu.

tendstofortytwo 5y ago

I think Windows 10 is simply very I/O dependent, much more so than older Windows or Linux, so having that SSD or not would make or break your experience. I've had really new (8th gen Intel) laptops perform absolutely atrocious until I swapped in an SSD. Ideally everyone should have an SSD in 2021, but that doesn't seem to have happened yet.

tored 5y ago
Yes, Windows 10 is very I/O dependent, it will not be a pleasant experience with a mechanical drive. Not sure if Windows 8 was too, I didn't use Windows 8 much (we all know why). If you can't afford a SSD drive, I recommend buy an older used one. Just as my machine is ancient, my SSD's are ancient too. My main drive is a Intel 530 180GB that started production in late of 2013.
- AstralStorm 5y ago
  It was too, when you stayed in the new .NET UI, with additional bugs. Note that shell itself is one of those applications. The problem there I think it's that all the CLR VMs are not free, specifically the libraries in them are loaded from disk, sizable and not shared across processes, and lazy loaded. Same problem as if you ran a lot of JVM applications.

drewzero1 5y ago

RAM matters too. I never had much trouble running Windows 7 with 2, 3, or 4GB but since upgrading our office machines I've noticed they feel sluggish with anything under 8.