3 ms·

Because such calculus what? Why don't they teach calculus, i'm genuinely interested, you've left us hanging! Edit: thinking on it a little, I'm guessing the m

Because such calculus what? Why don't they teach calculus, i'm genuinely interested, you've left us hanging! Edit: thinking on it a little, I'm guessing the missing sentence is 'because such calculus is not on the test'.

naveen99 5y ago
Something doesn’t add up. It’s not like there is a shortage of challenging material to learn and test on. I don’t know why tests are easy and then the people who can’t ace the watered down tests compete amongst themselves for the less less able titles. why don’t they just put some general relativity, quantum field theory, regular expressions, group theory, Elliptic curves, taxes, sec regulations, emacs, vim, options pricing, portfolio risk management, reinforcement learning, go, chess etc on the test…
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- Danieru 5y ago
  > I don’t know why tests are easy and then the people who can’t ace the watered down tests compete amongst themselves for the less less able titles The tests are not easy, and the "passing score" is set by the sum of competition. The techniques allowed to be taught, and which get tested are obtuse. Instead of allowing brilliant students to progress into more difficult subjects the tests funnel the entire country into the same testing flow. It would be like trying to score everyone based on arithmetic. Yes arithmetic is easy, but given enough volume of overly complex questions even easy skills can be tortured to create a grading curve.
  - naveen99 5y ago
    That’s my point. Why not test the brilliant students (and optionally allow everyone) on the more difficult subjects to begin with ?
    - Danieru 5y ago
      Ah. The specific Chinese reason is that the Government says no.
      - naveen99 5y ago
        but why should the government want to lower the educational standard for everyone ? It doesn’t make any sense. The rich and poor benefit when everyone is better educated.

naveen99 5y ago

Something doesn’t add up. It’s not like there is a shortage of challenging material to learn and test on. I don’t know why tests are easy and then the people who can’t ace the watered down tests compete amongst themselves for the less less able titles. why don’t they just put some general relativity, quantum field theory, regular expressions, group theory, Elliptic curves, taxes, sec regulations, emacs, vim, options pricing, portfolio risk management, reinforcement learning, go, chess etc on the test…

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
Danieru 5y ago
> I don’t know why tests are easy and then the people who can’t ace the watered down tests compete amongst themselves for the less less able titles The tests are not easy, and the "passing score" is set by the sum of competition. The techniques allowed to be taught, and which get tested are obtuse. Instead of allowing brilliant students to progress into more difficult subjects the tests funnel the entire country into the same testing flow. It would be like trying to score everyone based on arithmetic. Yes arithmetic is easy, but given enough volume of overly complex questions even easy skills can be tortured to create a grading curve.
- naveen99 5y ago
  That’s my point. Why not test the brilliant students (and optionally allow everyone) on the more difficult subjects to begin with ?
  - Danieru 5y ago
    Ah. The specific Chinese reason is that the Government says no.
    - naveen99 5y ago
      but why should the government want to lower the educational standard for everyone ? It doesn’t make any sense. The rich and poor benefit when everyone is better educated.