> That is irrelevant because the main point is, the attack will be unsuccessful. Is your claim here that the Fed cannot afford to buy the 51% attack? Keep in m

> That is irrelevant because the main point is, the attack will be unsuccessful. Is your claim here that the Fed cannot afford to buy the 51% attack? Keep in mind that they printed about 6 trillion dollars last year. If the Fed can buy a 51% attack then they will be successful. They will demonstrate beyond a doubt that an entity with the power to print fiat can always take down a decentralized, permissionless network by exploiting those very features.