How about re-framing the problem? Considering: Reclamation and recycling technology will improve over time. Similarly the economics of processing recycled m

How about re-framing the problem? Considering: Reclamation and recycling technology will improve over time. Similarly the economics of processing recycled material are likely to make it more valuable. and: Supposing we can protect the surroundings, water table etc. further: Supposing, as other comments have pointed out, the availability of land is not really an issue. Then: Is it crazy to think that there is value to be found in safely storing this material until it is more feasible / valuable to process? At least it seems like a better plan than incinerating it.