For what it's worth, I've known Matthew for many years. Although I wouldn't at all say we're close, I feel like I've had enough conversation to know who he is.

For what it's worth, I've known Matthew for many years. Although I wouldn't at all say we're close, I feel like I've had enough conversation to know who he is. Matthew is a good guy, I've never considered him to be tone deaf, and I genuinely believe he has the best interest of the many at his core. That said, the credence given to the visually impaired across the industry is categorically, absolutely, abysmally awful. I've never taken it as seriously as I should in my career, near all decision makers I know don't take it as seriously as they should, and I think shame on me and shame on everyone else. Things should be easier for visually impaired people, a) because it's the right thing to do and b) because it's low hanging fruit. While I don't think Matthew is unique, I do think he has a particularly significant responsibility given how important his technology is. As a shareholder, a friend, and a customer: I hope he takes this seriously, and I suspect he would.