3 ms·
The Reason Foundation (which is slightly right leaning of center, but makes its case using actual studies and facts) has a great explainer on how plastic bag ba
by mike_d 5y ago
The Reason Foundation (which is slightly right leaning of center, but makes its case using actual studies and facts) has a great explainer on how plastic bag bans for example hurt the environment more than help and cost consumers (including low income individuals) an extra $1b/yr: https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/california_plastic_bag_ban.pdf https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/california_plast...
- pharmakom 5y agoDoes anywhere have an actual plastic bag ban? Usually it’s just a minimum price to discourage people from grabbing a new bag on every visit
- mike_d 5y agoYes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_lightweight_plastic_bags_in_the_United_States#Summary_of_plastic_bag_laws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase-out_of_lightweight_plast...
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- wk_end 5y agoReason is a libertarian think tank. Describing them as “slightly right leaning of center” is really sugarcoating things - their whole raison d’etre is coming up with arguments to oppose virtually any and all government regulations. That doesn’t make them wrong necessarily, but let’s call a spade a spade.
- mint2 5y agoBut there’s basically no reasonable way to say that single use plastic is good for the environment. They are clearly a local minima that has seemed tricky for the market to break out of. Unless they make a case that that single use bags are actually the global minima or the global minima is just not worth it, the reason foundation is being rather myoptic when presenting why people attempts to get out of the local minima are bad.