5 ms·
>They want it because it makes for a better social network. Psueudoanonymous accounts certainly haven't made Twitter a worse social network. My stream would be
by mcantelon 15y ago
>They want it because it makes for a better social network.
Psueudoanonymous accounts certainly haven't made Twitter a worse social network. My stream would be considerably duller without them.
Ideally, Google should allow those who only want to interact with real named accounts to indicate this in their account settings. Filtering, not censorship, is in order.
- jonknee 15y agoConsidering all the bots and spam accounts that pollute twitter, I'm not sure if I agree.
- mcantelon 15y agoYeah, you have a point. I'm willing to put up with the spam for getting to read anonymous viewpoints, but others my not be, so ideally it should be an option.
- icebraining 15y agoThat's what I don't get: in a social network where you only receive updates from people you have subscribed, how can spammers affect the experience?
- jonknee 15y agoTwitter's @replies are a good example. Friend requests / follow updates are another.