5 ms·

Fashion is basically part of a real world interface for the social groups you interact with, a way to tweak the first impression. It's only junk for you as an o

Fashion is basically part of a real world interface for the social groups you interact with, a way to tweak the first impression. It's only junk for you as an outsider not understanding the social groups of insiders dressing a certain way. It's valuable and sells because social ladders are everywhere, we're all apes to a degree. It's not a suprise that the epic centers are urban melting pots with a higher population density and more "troubled people".

savingsPossible 5y ago
Maybe both? There are social ladders, and there are people using social ladders to sell clothes they started working on last year?
TuringNYC 5y ago
>> Fashion is basically part of a real world interface for the social groups you interact with, a way to tweak the first impression. It's only junk for you as an outsider not understanding the social groups of insiders dressing a certain way. I've seen former peers and fellow students borrow and become indebted to become part of the group this way. Great if the subject can afford it, not so much if the subject is now enslaved to debt or is misallocating funds. Then, perhaps find more welcoming social groups?
- dukeyukey 5y ago
  Any culture group that expresses itself through expensive clothes will find another expensive way to show group membership if clothes aren't an option. Other subcultures (think grunge, or tech people) either use cheap mismatched charity-shop styles or use other signals (e.g. running Linux at home).
  - TuringNYC 5y ago
    This is so true! If the definition of fashion is extended to also include the latest smartphones, laptops, or service memberships. I never thought of it this way, but makes a lot of sense.
coldtea 5y ago
>Fashion is basically part of a real world interface for the social groups you interact with, a way to tweak the first impression. Yes. But it's a shallow real world interface, for shallow groups and facile identities, mostly used to associate with teenagers and juvenile group forming. I dont say it's not a thing, or don't have a use. I say the use is bad.
- slewis 5y ago
  You’re expressing your opinion as if it’s a cold hard truth.
  - daddylongstroke 5y ago
    Which part? That fashion/clothing industry is not the leading cause of pollution in the world (aka. bad ecologically)?
- fud7r7rgtf 5y ago
  This is rediculous. Just a few years ago there was an article about silicon valley casual fashion being challenging for minorities who grew up outside the bubble and were taught to dress their best in a work suit or similar. The LGBT is huge on visual signals of allegiance. Popular brands are built 80% on what their brand signals and not on their build quality. There are countless examples of clothing being used to signal elements of personal identity but for some reason you seem to consider this 'fascile' because our wardrobes aren't full-on biographies of personality.

savingsPossible 5y ago

Maybe both? There are social ladders, and there are people using social ladders to sell clothes they started working on last year?

TuringNYC 5y ago

>> Fashion is basically part of a real world interface for the social groups you interact with, a way to tweak the first impression. It's only junk for you as an outsider not understanding the social groups of insiders dressing a certain way. I've seen former peers and fellow students borrow and become indebted to become part of the group this way. Great if the subject can afford it, not so much if the subject is now enslaved to debt or is misallocating funds. Then, perhaps find more welcoming social groups?

dukeyukey 5y ago
Any culture group that expresses itself through expensive clothes will find another expensive way to show group membership if clothes aren't an option. Other subcultures (think grunge, or tech people) either use cheap mismatched charity-shop styles or use other signals (e.g. running Linux at home).
- TuringNYC 5y ago
  This is so true! If the definition of fashion is extended to also include the latest smartphones, laptops, or service memberships. I never thought of it this way, but makes a lot of sense.

coldtea 5y ago

>Fashion is basically part of a real world interface for the social groups you interact with, a way to tweak the first impression. Yes. But it's a shallow real world interface, for shallow groups and facile identities, mostly used to associate with teenagers and juvenile group forming. I dont say it's not a thing, or don't have a use. I say the use is bad.

slewis 5y ago
You’re expressing your opinion as if it’s a cold hard truth.
- daddylongstroke 5y ago
  Which part? That fashion/clothing industry is not the leading cause of pollution in the world (aka. bad ecologically)?
fud7r7rgtf 5y ago
This is rediculous. Just a few years ago there was an article about silicon valley casual fashion being challenging for minorities who grew up outside the bubble and were taught to dress their best in a work suit or similar. The LGBT is huge on visual signals of allegiance. Popular brands are built 80% on what their brand signals and not on their build quality. There are countless examples of clothing being used to signal elements of personal identity but for some reason you seem to consider this 'fascile' because our wardrobes aren't full-on biographies of personality.