3 ms·
I'm happy to see that I'm not alone in my struggles with jq. I wanted to love it right out of the box. It appears to be very well engineered, but over and over
by mftb 5y ago
I'm happy to see that I'm not alone in my struggles with jq. I wanted to love it right out of the box. It appears to be very well engineered, but over and over again I have struggled with it's syntax.
What I think I want is a syntax closer to css selectors. What I think I'm going to have to do is really stop and learn jq. It looks like some of the links in here may help.