3 ms·
Well, I guess that's what you get for constantly airing misinformation.
by King-Aaron 5y ago
Well, I guess that's what you get for constantly airing misinformation.
- jycr753 5y agoThey all do.
- p1necone 5y agoThis is probably technically true, but not useful. It's the scale of the misinformation in the Murdoch news empire that's concerning.
- refurb 5y agoOf course. We’d only ever censor the news organizations that are really wrong.
- bill_mcgonigle 5y agoWaPo called out NYT for fake news twice yesterday. This supports your argument - they both can't be right! They both can be wrong, of course.
- ballerburg9005 5y agoThat is what you get for airing neutral opinions. In neutral journalism, all sides are interviewed and given grounds to discuss the matter fairly. You don't for example just interview Arabs when it comes to Israel, you interview all sides. But with Youtube's Covid censorship policy in place, each time a so to speak "Jew" was interviewed, the journalist would receive a strike for it and just be banned after 3 strikes. That people didn't go out and instantly boycott Youtube for this anti-democratic experiment is ridiculous.
- King-Aaron 5y agoThis would be true for [anyone except Sky]. There is absolutely nothing neutral about their reporting.
- 0xdeadb00f 5y agoI'm sorry, did you just unironically call a Murdoch media company "neutral" in opinion? The rest of your comment I don't disagree with.
- aryonoco 5y agohahaha Sky News Australia.... neutral.... hahahaha.... good joke mate....