3 ms·
In case you missed it in the article, it explicitly says that they still suggest sending the data to the government: > A person's sex designation at birth woul
by merlincorey 5y ago
In case you missed it in the article, it explicitly says that they still suggest sending the data to the government:
> A person's sex designation at birth would still be submitted to the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth for medical, public health, and statistical use only, report authors note.
- roenxi 5y agoI did miss that, although I see they hid it deep in the third paragraph. What a bafflingly stupid plan then. If they expect this to be fluid over someone's life, the government doesn't need to collect stats at birth.
- goldenkey 5y agoWell they are doing it as signaling, not necessarily for good.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]