4 ms·
I believe we do understand, broadly speaking, thinking and consciousness. There remains a lot more to learn, as in anything in science... IMO the main difficul
by epgui 5y ago
I believe we do understand, broadly speaking, thinking and consciousness. There remains a lot more to learn, as in anything in science...
IMO the main difficulty is that humans have terrible self-awareness or self-insight. We want to believe we're special, we want to believe we're intelligent, we want to believe we're different than machines. We're in denial about that.
Our brains aren't any more special than computers, other than that it's really quite formidable that we evolved them by chance in this universe of chemical soup we find ourselves in. At the end of the day, however, a computer is a computer, and "thinking" and "consciousness" simply do emerge from low-level computations given some special structures.
- rapferreira 5y agoAre you kidding? Go read Hegel's phenomonology of mind and get back to me on that
- epgui 5y agoA philosophical treatise from 1807, no matter how interesting or insightful, could hardly represent the current state of understanding of the topic. My comment is loosely based on a general appreciation of textbook-level neuroanatomy and recent advances in AI/comp sci.