4 ms·
Multiple providers has been the “name of the game” for a long time now, so it’s not surprising that Blue Origin or ULA got caught off guard. They had to know th
by Hayvok 5y ago
Multiple providers has been the “name of the game” for a long time now, so it’s not surprising that Blue Origin or ULA got caught off guard. They had to know this Day was coming, but maybe not so quickly.
This should be a wake up call to established space players: the days of cost-plus contracts, multiple bid winners, and endless cost and time overruns - are over. There’s no purpose to those anymore.
For the past fifty years this all made sense: going to space was hard, and the financial risks were astronomical. This decision highlights how much progress we’ve made toward establishing a “space economy”. Space has been de-risked enough that the corporations can take on the (previously fatal) risk of a fixed-price contract. De-risked enough that the government is reasonably certain of achieving a strategic objective with a single provider.
BO, ULA, et. al - the game just changed. Adapt, or die.
- nickik 5y agoMutlbile providers wasn't really a thing until Commercial Cargo and that was with fixed price. But this wasn't always true. For Commercial Lunar resupply they went with SpaceX only as well. The traditional was one supplier with cost plus.