3 ms·

>they did not claim a real life vaccine injury, they claimed "many people Ok here you go.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8 https://www.youtube.com

by forcry 5y ago

>they did not claim a real life vaccine injury, they claimed "many people Ok here you go.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxqC9SiRh8 The community of people injured by the vaccine, mentioned in the video. https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/ https://www.c19vaxreactions.com/

SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
First is politician who is known for ... "scoring partisan political points" on this topic to put it mildly https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ron-johnson-vaccine-covid-1160567/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ron-john... Second, IIRC is a clearing house for self-reporting unverified claims. Not a group of people that OP personally knows. Basically a big old nothingburger, thanks for wasting 5 minutes our time.
- forcry 5y ago
  Wait. What is your point exactly? The people in the first video are paid actors...or something? Also, a question to everyone who come across this. Do you think the people in the first video, who took part in trials and suffered injuries, deserve medical/financial support from the government or the companies who did the trials?
  - SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
    Ron Johnsons' nonsense is dangerous and nonsense.
    - forcry 5y ago
      Do you doubt the legitimacy of people in the first video?
      - sorethescore 5y ago
        Yes. 100% doubt.
        forcry 5y ago
        I see. Look, for me it does not add up. I mean, what is their end game? If the whole thing gains public support and popularity, which we have to assume their intention is, the people in the video can be easily followed up and their claims validated (I am pretty sure the opposition would love to do it, which would be also quite easy). Which will ultimately backfire on themselves, which make it unlikely to be their (at least the senator's) endgame.. So what is it? Also, why is there no fact check that "debunks" the whole thing?
        SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
        > Which will ultimately backfire on themselves, which make it unlikely to be their (at least the senator's) endgame.. Will it? Are you sure? US media is now so polarised that the various echo-chambers almost never intersect. The US right anti-covid train has been going for an appallingly long time, why would it stop now due to mere facts. There have been facts all long, that hasn't made a difference. To that topic or others that I could name. > Also, why is there no fact check that "debunks" the whole thing? Are you sure that there isn't? Have you looked? I linked to an article "debunking" the same character, upthread. I know their name and their position, but I do not follow all their antics: Circus clowns gonna circus clown. It's not on me to research a debunking of that specific performance.
        forcry 5y ago
        >Will it? Are you sure? Pretty sure. Why do you think the opposition won't take care of it? >Are you sure that there isn't? It would help if you ignore the politician in it. I am taking about the actual people in the first video, who claim to have suffered AEFIs.
        5y ago

by forcry 5y ago

SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago

First is politician who is known for ... "scoring partisan political points" on this topic to put it mildly https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ron-johnson-vaccine-covid-1160567/ https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/ron-john... Second, IIRC is a clearing house for self-reporting unverified claims. Not a group of people that OP personally knows. Basically a big old nothingburger, thanks for wasting 5 minutes our time.

forcry 5y ago
Wait. What is your point exactly? The people in the first video are paid actors...or something? Also, a question to everyone who come across this. Do you think the people in the first video, who took part in trials and suffered injuries, deserve medical/financial support from the government or the companies who did the trials?
- SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
  Ron Johnsons' nonsense is dangerous and nonsense.
  - forcry 5y ago
    Do you doubt the legitimacy of people in the first video?
    - sorethescore 5y ago
      Yes. 100% doubt.
      - forcry 5y ago
        I see. Look, for me it does not add up. I mean, what is their end game? If the whole thing gains public support and popularity, which we have to assume their intention is, the people in the video can be easily followed up and their claims validated (I am pretty sure the opposition would love to do it, which would be also quite easy). Which will ultimately backfire on themselves, which make it unlikely to be their (at least the senator's) endgame.. So what is it? Also, why is there no fact check that "debunks" the whole thing?
        SideburnsOfDoom 5y ago
        > Which will ultimately backfire on themselves, which make it unlikely to be their (at least the senator's) endgame.. Will it? Are you sure? US media is now so polarised that the various echo-chambers almost never intersect. The US right anti-covid train has been going for an appallingly long time, why would it stop now due to mere facts. There have been facts all long, that hasn't made a difference. To that topic or others that I could name. > Also, why is there no fact check that "debunks" the whole thing? Are you sure that there isn't? Have you looked? I linked to an article "debunking" the same character, upthread. I know their name and their position, but I do not follow all their antics: Circus clowns gonna circus clown. It's not on me to research a debunking of that specific performance.
        forcry 5y ago
        >Will it? Are you sure? Pretty sure. Why do you think the opposition won't take care of it? >Are you sure that there isn't? It would help if you ignore the politician in it. I am taking about the actual people in the first video, who claim to have suffered AEFIs.
        5y ago