4 ms·
Both you and the parent seem to assume that 'evolution' means 'improvement' Humanity has clearly evolved, even in the last 200 years. Doesn't mean we are gett
by mellavora 5y ago
Both you and the parent seem to assume that 'evolution' means 'improvement'
Humanity has clearly evolved, even in the last 200 years.
Doesn't mean we are getting better
- rantwasp 5y agoI think there is an individual and a meta/society level. I think both me and GP were referring to the individual/micro level.
- IggleSniggle 5y agoAnd I think the person you are responding to was acknowledging that evolution didn’t just stop…as long as there are babies there are mutations, and the environment will select for some qualities over others. If you meant super micro, then the same can be said of your immune system / gut flora, though I’m not certain of the relevance. The point is that “evolution” doesn’t magically direct to some better outcome, or even towards a more sustainable local maxima.
- zikduruqe 5y agoOur software has improved since the domestication of animals and crops. Our hardware has not changed and we are still on H. Sapiens 1.0.
- fakedang 5y agoIsn't it the other way? Hardware has changed as massive inventions have augmented our living standards. While at the same time, the software (IE human mentality) hasn't over 1000s of years, except for maybe hard disk usage (which is human knowledge).
- mint2 5y agoThe hardware they were referring to is the human body. All that’s changed is we know how to maintain it better and can fix more types of premature breakdowns. It’s essentially the same hardware, just better maintained.
- monkeycantype 5y agoI hope you’re correct. All our domesticated animals have smaller brains than their wild cousins. If the phrenologists hadn’t been so focussed on proving their racist fantasies, would they have found our skulls a few marbles smaller than our ancient (modern human) ancestors?
- sizzle 5y agoWill CRISPR on humans usher in Homosapiens 2.0 in our lifetimes?