4 ms·
Wait... This comment isn't serious. I read that. You just tail the file to find the error. But it's very useful to go through it all. It's not garbage to me. I
by aspaceman 5y ago
Wait...
This comment isn't serious. I read that. You just tail the file to find the error. But it's very useful to go through it all. It's not garbage to me. I find most logs quite readable.
- ithinkso 5y agoIt was serious. You haven't seen what I've seen. ENV variables at every step? print them, build has a parser/codegen step? print everything it does, sanity check scripts? I always need to know what they did, setup scripts? That's the most important part, every .o file compiled and linked? show me, with the compile command for a good measure so all the -Ilibs's are there? of course, set -x? why not, need to wget/curl something? output goes to the log, is it in parallel? just append as it goes, build failed? start the teardown but make sure you add everything it does to the log And as I wrote, I hope it all just terminates at the first error so I can tail the logs... but it's not always that pretty. I don't believe you've read those instead of tailing for an error or doing the fast scroll to find something looking somewhat off I mean, I'm used to it now, I'll grep, less, tail and I'll find what I need, I'm just baffled that it has so much unnecessary data for every single build. At one company I've got good enough at it that I could press-and-hold pageup from the bottom in less and staring at the streaming bytes Matrix-style looking for a place of interest