“reporting news or disseminating information that may frighten people or intentionally distorting information to cause a misunderstanding about the emergency si

“reporting news or disseminating information that may frighten people or intentionally distorting information to cause a misunderstanding about the emergency situation, which may eventually affect state security, order or good morality of the people.” Note the wording. What is written left of that "or" makes the rest purely redundant and unnecessary, although it serves its purpose as smoke in the eyes. And the "good morality" part is also 100% subjective. If taken to the letter, a mere reporting of a coming tsunami wave could have someone arrested. Vague laws that can be easily bent or taken to the letter, according on whom they're applied to (friend/enemy) are always a telling sign of heavily corrupt governments.