3 ms·
The end of XUL was necessary to make Firefox faster. Doenload an old XUL Firefox version and surf the web. If you don't notice a difference in page load speed,
by foepys 5y ago
The end of XUL was necessary to make Firefox faster. Doenload an old XUL Firefox version and surf the web. If you don't notice a difference in page load speed, startup time, and overall responsiveness, you might have a very, very fast computer, which most people around the world don't have.
The 3 or 4 thousand power users that needed native interop were (and still are) of no interest compared to the then bad performance of Firefox in relation to Chrome. Even HN was full of people who complained about Firefox' performance. Now it's full of people who recommend to give Firefox another shot because it's fast again.
Firefox is also currently the only browser where uBlock Origin can use all of its features, Chrome is intentionally limiting APIs. Are people using Firefox because of it? No. So XUL add-ons would not have helped Firefox.
If you still want XUL, there are many forks out there that claim to support it.
- TiccyRobby 5y agoMy number one reason to use Firefox is uBlock Origin. It does an exceptional job and web is way more annoying without it.
- Kye 5y agouBlock Origin is available for Chrome and Chrome-based browsers.
- stjohnswarts 5y agobut only as long as google leaves api "blocks" open for it. They are slowly removing those
- foepys 5y agoNo, there is only a subset of features available for Chrome. You don't get quite few important privacy features. https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...