5 ms·
>It was based on the idea that the decision to approve the vaccine is the job of the FDA and that they have to pass their safety and effectiveness verdict. You
by beerandt 5y ago
>It was based on the idea that the decision to approve the vaccine is the job of the FDA and that they have to pass their safety and effectiveness verdict.
You can't claim they were just following the rules, because they weren't. They bended and broke whatever rules they saw fit to get the vaccine done, including doing multiple phases simultaneously. If the FDA were following the rules, we still wouldn't have a vaccine available, because they still don't have full FDA approval.
>Trump was still rejecting SARS-COV-19 as irrelevant
Trump was called racist by Congressional D's for wanting to shut down the international travel to prevent the spread in February.
- oezi 5y ago> You can't claim they were just following the rules, because they weren't. They bended and broke whatever rules they saw fit to get the vaccine done, including doing multiple phases simultaneously. I don't get your argument here. On the one side people are insinuating that the democrats influenced the FDA to delay the vaccine, then you suggest that the FDA rushed it. > Trump was called racist by Congressional D's for wanting to shut down the international travel to prevent the spread in February. It is tiresome to discuss with Americans. Why rip everything out of context? https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/the-facts-on-trumps-travel-restrictions/ https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/the-facts-on-trumps-travel...
- beerandt 5y agoThey either broke rules or followed them, as they saw convenient. There's no need for democrat influence; the vast majority of government employees are democrats. The collective behavior is both emergent and dogmatic. >I don't get your argument here. You think it's only possible to break rules in one direction at a time? Then I wouldn't expect you to get it. Maybe politics isn't for you. >It is tiresome to discuss with Americans Then don't. What's out of context? >fact check dot org Oh. Well if a left wing funded propaganda site can spin that "ban" doesn't really mean "ban" bc some people got exemptions; and even if it was a "ban" then it wasn't a good one; and even if it was a good one, it wasn't very effective... I guess that covers all possible angles. Biden literally called Trump xenophobic the following day. How's that for out of context? Grow up or go back to r/whatever.