4 ms·
You’re assuming the innocents killed were bystanders, not targets.
by abalone 5y ago
You’re assuming the innocents killed were bystanders, not targets.
- libertyhouse 5y agoYes - the question assumes that innocents are not intentionally targeted.
- abalone 5y agoThen your question about “bystanders” is irrelevant to the topic at hand. The article claims people were selected to be killed on very flimsy evidence, yet always classified as enemies killed in action. These are not “bystanders.” You will now perhaps attempt to argue that this does not constitute “intentional” killing of innocents, which has a similar problem with relevance. Indiscriminate killing is highly immoral.