3 ms·
If only the OP had provided a picture of their login screen, so that we could evaluate whether they're missing a "login with Apple" button and Apple is making a
by nimih 5y ago
If only the OP had provided a picture of their login screen, so that we could evaluate whether they're missing a "login with Apple" button and Apple is making a reasonable request, or whether such a button already exists and the OP is caught in a byzantine maze of confusing and contradictory instructions that they will only be able to escape through a combination of perseverance and blind luck.
- dmitryminkovsky 5y agoFor what it's worth, I must stress that they sent me that screenshot. > escape through a combination of perseverance and blind luck. It's funny you say that, because you know what I did finally provide? A bunch of 15-30 second videos demonstrating the salient features (sign in with apple, user safety features, how to get to terms of service and privacy statement, etc) that Apple wants to know about. After that the back-and-forth ended and my app got approved. But that may have just been a coincidence.
- MichaelZuo 5y agoPerhaps I woke up in a strange parallel world given the downvotes but isn’t the usual assumption that a button for a feature != the feature actually working correctly? In other words the button, or sign in pathway, could have had some sort of ‘bug’. I assume that is why Apple’s system flagged it, otherwise we would have to believe that the folks working on Apple’s app store ‘sign in with AppleID’ review team are bozos and flagged, or had an AI that flagged, a working implementation that followed their guidelines? If that is the case then I agree since tens of thousands of apps have now implemented ‘sign in with AppleID’ a few months after a splashy introduction with undoubtably lots of behind the scenes attention it’s a pretty bizarre maze to get caught in.