The article has been deleted. But it wasn't "here's some generic tips on how to figure things out", it was more along the lines of "take the second character of

The article has been deleted. But it wasn't "here's some generic tips on how to figure things out", it was more along the lines of "take the second character of the first word of each of the first four lines, and then the last word on each line will tell you a Google search - first result will have an article author, take that author's family name". It wasn't general "how to figure things out", but more "if I write these three riddles I'm not specifically saying person A and person B's names, and therefore I'm not in contempt". The court took a dim view of that.