4 ms·
Killing millions of innocent people in a pointless war does not seem like a very good way too prove that all countries should respect human rights. I mean as op
by qwytw 5y ago
Killing millions of innocent people in a pointless war does not seem like a very good way too prove that all countries should respect human rights. I mean as oppressive as the Chinese government is almost all of the people they oppress in Honkong or the mainland are still much better of (and more free) than they would be during or after WWIII regardless of who won. And claiming that it would be the right way to solve these "irreconcilable" differences is much more antithetical to the Declaration of Human Rights than whatever China is doing now...
- AllegedAlec 5y ago> And claiming that it would be the right way to solve these "irreconcilable" differences is much more antithetical to the Declaration of Human Rights than whatever China is doing now... I'm not saying it's right. I'm saying its inevitable.
- stale2002 5y agoWe don't have to kill them. Instead, we just have to recognize where they are wrong, and oppose them as much as is feasible. If there was a modern day nazi nation, that was genoiciding people en mass, that had nukes, such that invasion was impossible/mutually destructive, the answer would be the same. Yes, sometimes it is difficult to stop all the bad things that evil people are doing. But that does not change the fact that those actions are still clearly evil and should be opposed where possible.